America's slavery, the Church's opportunity
The New Colossus
By Emma Lazarus, 1883
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
~ Statue of Liberty Poem
"What
is more, I consider everything a loss because of the surpassing worth
of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have lost all things. I
consider them garbage, that I may gain Christ."
~The Holy Spirit through St. Paul
"In
reproducing the photo for a campuswide email, LSU made the decision to
airbrush out the crosses on the students' chests. See, The Painted Posse
is a group of Christian-centered Tiger fans, and, well, someone
somewhere inside LSU decided not to mix football and religion. (Which is
a bit surprising, considering that in the SEC, football IS religion.)" (LINK)
You may not be able to see it, but on their left shoulders the guys have crosses painted there
Someone at LSU airbrushed the crosses out of the photo before using in an LSU email.
"The
school, in a statement, indicated that it was not trying to censor any
views, but rather to avoid the appearance of endorsing one. "We don't
want to imply we are making any religious or political statements, so we
air-brushed it out," the school said in a statement to Fox News.
"Only one of the students, who didn't appreciate it, actually contacted
us about it. So next time, we'll just choose a different photo."
"Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive."
~ C.S. Lewis
I've
always liked that quote. But what Lewis says here is a double edged
sword. Is it right to force a non-Christian nation to accept the
constraints of Christianity? Frankly, the argument Christians have
every right to impose, what they view as righteous laws, on others has
largely been based on the claim the founding fathers meant to found a
Christian nation. Since the founders meant to create a nation built on
the bedrock of Judeo-Christian beliefs it's not merely a strongly
heartfelt position held, but an inalienable right. "...Christians have
the right to rule their own country," as Jerry Falwell put it. The
first major problem with this belief is Christ is a king, and he has a
kingdom he tells us plainly is not of this world. Of course the
argument then shifts from one of the intent of creating a Christian
nation to now speaking of a nation founded upon Christian principles. A
Christian nation and a nation founded upon Judeo-Christian principles
are vastly different things. The Christian nation is a kingdom ruled
by Christ Jesus, and it is not of this world. A nation following
certain principles doesn't require Christ at all. In fact a nation
founded upon Judeo-Christian principles doesn't follow a Christ centered
model. The model for a nation built upon Judeo-Christian principles
follows more a Moses centered model of ruling. A nation is given a set
of standards which are codified into legal responsibilities for the
nation's citizens. The law of Moses, if broken, carried the most dire
of punishments, death and/or being cut off from among the people; what
we'd call today 'excommunication'. Forcing compliance works with the
Moses model, but it doesn't work with the Jesus model. Jesus makes it
clear that the keeping of laws is no way to become a citizen in his
kingdom.
Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever.
"The
who sins is a slave..." The religious leaders listening to Jesus teach
this wouldn't have problem with what Jesus is teaching. After all
Jesus is teaching what they themselves believe. At that time one of
the most common form of slavery was basically indentured service. A
person who could not support himself could find someone who would care
for his needs, train him in a useful trade. The slave would then work
off the debt owed to his master, and upon completion of the service
would be freed from slavery. This kind of slavery was the Roman world's
version of welfare. We all know, none of us is perfect, even the
religious leaders knew they weren't perfect, but they thought their
efforts to keep the Mosaic laws and their continuous reaching for
perfection in practice kept them in good stead with God. Jesus turns
the tables on them when he goes onto say, "...Now a slave has no
permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever." OUCH!
Jesus tells them, you don't get it. "Your relationship to Abraham
doesn't make you a son in God's house. Even if an indentured slave
could pay the full monetary worth of his slavery, or even a 100x his
indebtedness, he would not be a member of the family. Adoption is the
only way for a slave to become a part of the family he served as
slave. It doesn't matter how hard the religious leaders worked to pay
off their debts to God, they would always have the status of "not a
member of the family." Paying one's sin debt to God by keeping laws
changes nothing for the slave to sin. The only thing which changes the
slave is adoption into the family.
No
matter the intent of the religious leaders of his day, they could do
nothing about their status as slaves. All members of Christ's kingdom
are adopted sons/daughters from among a world enslaved to sin.
Christianity isn't a national treasure, Christianity is the adoption by
God in his family. God achieves this adoption by paying off the slaves
debt by enslaving his only Son to a Roman cross and finally to the
grave. God then offers adoption, through his resurrected Son, into his
eternal family. Christianity isn't something any human founder or
citizen of any nation in the world, can bestow. Christianity is God's
alone to bestow.
In
this election season, when we pick our leaders, vote your conscience,
but do not say, in any part of your being, "I am doing this because this
is a Christian nation, and we need to take it back for Christ." If
Christ wanted this nation he'd have already taken it.
"Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me."
So
what's a Christian to do about this "Nanny State"? There are so many
burdens upon the state, and the children it cares for, like slavery to
sin, so extend a little grace. Stop tying up heavy loads which you drop
on men's shoulders, you know religious rules and laws against, say gay
marriage, though you will not lift a finger to help them find freedom in
Christ. Keeping laws against gay marriage or even abortion won't
change the status of slaves. Remember you are not of this world, just
as Christ is not of this world. Remember that you are adopted Children
of the living God, and the freedom of Christ can't be taken away, even
by the most powerful "Nanny State" on the earth. Seek first to serve
God's kingdom and purposes, and then he can show you how best to engage a
world enslaved to sin, and the body politic (also enslaved to sin, by
the way).
Good, but not God's statute of liberty
God's statute of liberty: Perfect!
No comments:
Post a Comment